Make the Most of Candidate Interviews
Friday, May 18, 2012 at 2:39PM After nearly thirty years of recruiting, both from inside a company and as a consultant, it’s fair to conclude many companies are not using interviews effectively to determine whether or not to hire a candidate. This article will illustrate three key areas where you may refine your skills.
Know what you’re looking for and ask about it
Begin with a thorough discovery process and explore the company, its competitive market position, and the position itself. In defining the role, dig into the job duties, the department composition, and manager’s style. This “picture” is a key part of a search strategy to identify candidates who best meet the needs of the role.
A mistake many companies make is not beginning their search with a thorough understanding of the situation and needs. Too often, the interview does not get to the real point of the interview: can the candidate do the job?
Interview questions need to explore the candidate’s practical experience in specific components of the role, and candidates should be asked to give examples and results of their work in executing various responsibilities of the position. For a manufacturing engineer, relevant questions might include:
- Give me an example of a time when you had to resolve a fixture design problem with your company’s design engineering staff.
- Describe your working relationship with floor employees. Give me an example of building this relationship, and another about how you mended a relationship that was in trouble.
- What have you found to be some practical approaches to increasing efficiency or driving costs out of the production process? For example…
Candidate answers should not be thoughts, theories or opinions…candidates should be asked for specific examples and experiences.
Use multiple interviews to gather information
At InPursuit, any viable candidate is evaluated during multiple contacts, beginning with a telephone interview, lasting up to an hour. Use this initial contact to prequalify candidates and determine the quality of mutual fit. In-person (or video) interviews, also lasting about an hour, may follow to further explore candidate qualifications and match to company need as described in the position specifications.
Hiring companies benefit from a multi-stage selection process. Screen candidates “in or out” by phone before setting up a live interview. The goal is a slate of a few qualified candidates, rather than how many candidates were interviewed live.
It is also recommended that the candidate interview several people. For a Manufacturing Engineer, the interview team might include the direct supervisor, quality manager, a production manager, and plant supervisor. The number should be restricted to those with decision-making impact on hiring. The interview team should be trained in interviewing, be provided a list of approved questions, and be prepared to complete an evaluation of each candidate, which includes the “must have requirements” of the position.
Final candidates are invited back for a follow up meeting, with dual purpose: first, to confirm the candidate’s qualifications and second, to promote the opportunity to the candidate. You might consider meeting in a less formal setting, such as over lunch or dinner. In such a setting, other aspects of the candidate’s style, communication skills, and interpersonal skills are explored.
Focus on “culture fit”
At InPursuit, our qualifications matrix has two parts: tangible skills and experiences, and intangibles. The first part is used to qualify a candidate; however the second part, the intangibles, will make or break a good hire.
Companies improve the hiring process by fully understanding their culture, or “what it feels like to work here.” It is important to use descriptive words to describe the culture, so the interview process may be used to explore how well the candidate will fit.
Most candidates will have experience working in different settings, and the interview may explore these settings further. In our example, cultural fit includes the department environment, as well as the direct manager’s style
Ask a candidate to give examples of the environments in which they have worked, and what they liked and disliked about each situation, then how they would describe an ideal work environment. Keep in mind that candidates won’t really know your company culture; therefore the candidate description of a desired culture or work environment should be a solid prediction of the quality of fit on the culture side.
In the end
Interviewing is challenging and time consuming. There are three ways to improve interviewing: explore the candidate’s experience based on specific qualifications, evaluate the candidate over multiple contacts, and determine the culture fit.
If companies improve in these areas, better hiring decisions will be made, and candidates have a much improved chance of making key contributions and staying with the company longer.
Candidate Assessement,
Employment,
Interviewing,
Recruiting in
Hiring 